Employers often want to create an employee leave policy that applies to all their workers, regardless of the state in which they work. Uniform multistate policies are appealing because they are relatively easy to administer when compared with a raft of different rules for different locales. Fairness is also a compelling feature of uniform policies, as such policies provide the same leave benefits to all workers.

However, given the patchwork of complicated and conflicting employee leave laws in effect across the United States, drafting a policy that complies with all the legal requirements a multistate employer may be subject to is a tricky endeavor. ThisCompliance Overview examines the challenges of designing and implementing multi-jurisdictional employee leave policies, so employers may evaluate whether such an approach best serves their organization.

Employee leave in the United States: The legal landscape

U.S. employers contemplating a multistate employee leave policy must understand the types of leave laws that might apply to them. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is the only nationwide leave law generally applicable to private employers. The FMLA requires employers with at least 50 employees to provide 12-26 weeks of unpaid leave to eligible employees for specific reasons relating to the health and welfare of the employees and their family members. A less frequently applied federal law, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) provides protections to employees on leave from work to serve in the military.

In the absence of more comprehensive federal leave laws, states have passed their own complicated and often conflicting mandates.

State FMLA

Many states chose to augment the federal FMLA by enacting their own unpaid family and medical leave laws that broaden the FMLA leave benefit in varied ways—for example, by expanding the types of employers and employees who are covered or by allowing leave for additional purposes beyond what the FMLA requires.

State paid FMLA

Over a dozen states and the District of Columbia have enacted paid family and medical leave (PFML) mandates, and an additional two states—New Hampshire and Vermont—have implemented voluntary PFML insurance programs. PFML legislation typically creates a state-run insurance program funded by contributions from employers, employees, or both.

State-paid sick leave/leave for any reason

In addition, nearly 20 states have passed paid leave laws requiring paid time off for various reasons relating to the health and safety of employees or their families or for any reason at all.

Other state leave mandates

States have also enacted laws that require employee leave for specific purposes, such as:

• Prenatal care
• Pregnancy disability
• Child bonding
• Children’s school activities
• Public health emergencies
• Support for victims of domestic violence and other crimes and their family members
• Bereavement
• Organ and blood donation
• Jury duty
• Voting
• Military deployment
• Military deployment of a family member

Some state FMLA, PFML and paid sick leave statutes incorporate one or more of the types of leave listed above. A state PFMLlaw might include pregnancy disability or child bonding as qualified reasons for leave, for instance.

{{richtext-cta-general-2="/components/rich-text-cta"}}

Local laws

Employers should be aware that localities like counties and cities have also enacted employee leave laws across the country, and employers within those jurisdictions must comply with them.

Features of employee leave laws

Employers hoping to adopt a uniform leave policy should look closely at the characteristics of all the leave laws they are subject to. Laws creating PFML, paid sick leave and other leave benefits vary significantly from state to state, as do the compliance burdens they impose. Some of the important items employers should watch for in employee leave laws are outlined in the chart below.

Highest common denominator

The factors described in the chart above illustrate how uneven state leave laws can be in their generosity to employees. A uniform policy might make sense if an employer’s operations are limited to states with similar employee leave requirements or no requirements at all. However, where different state leave laws apply and essential elements of those laws differ, the employer will have to adopt the most employee-friendly version of each legal requirement—a highest common denominator—for its policy to be uniform and legally compliant.

To see how this plays out in practice, consider the following example:

The Grocery Town supermarket chain, with workers in Maryland and the District of Columbia, would like to implement one PFML policy for all of its employees by July 1, 2025, the date contributions begin for Maryland’s new PFML program. The Maryland PFML program is funded by equal employer and employee contributions (for employers with at least 15 employees), but the district PFML is funded entirely by employers. To have a uniform policy, Grocery Town would have to bear the full cost of the PFML premium for its Maryland workers, even though this expense is not required by Maryland law.

The district and Maryland PFML programs differ in other respects as well. For instance, the district’s program does not offer employees job protection, but the Maryland program does. To be uniform, Grocery Town’s policy would have to provide job protection to its district employees, just as it does for its employees in Maryland.

The two PFML programs also vary in the length of leave they require. In the district, employees may take a maximum of 14 weeks of leave per year (in certain circumstances, depending on the reasons for leave), while in Maryland, the yearly maximum is 24 weeks (again, depending on the reasons for leave). A uniform multistate policy would see Grocery Town providing 24 weeks of leave to all its employees.

This example illustrates just a few contrasting requirements of the District of Columbia and Maryland PFML laws. A comprehensive uniform employee leave policy that covers both regions, additional states, or involves additional forms of leave could disadvantage an employer even further.

Key considerations

Deciding whether to adopt a uniform, multi-jurisdictional leave policy is a complex assessment. Step one is for employers to take stock of all legal leave requirements that apply in all jurisdictions where they have workers.

Next, employers should identify the most employee-friendly features of these requirements and understand that with a uniform policy, the most generous features will have to be applied across their workforce. This analysis should help the employer get a sense of the cost of their proposed multi-jurisdictional policy and, in turn, help them conclude whether that cost outweighs the administrative ease and equity the policy would offer.

Finally, employers should appreciate that employee leave is currently a highly dynamic area of the law, with new laws and rules being passed and existing requirements amended frequently. Regardless of whether they adopt a uniform plan, employers should keep abreast of developments in the law and alter their policies accordingly to stay compliant.

Links and resources

• U.S. Department of Labor webpage on FMLA
• U.S. Department of Labor chart of state PFML laws
• U.S. Department of Labor webpage on paid leave

​

Provided to you by Christensen Group Insurance. This Compliance Overview is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel for legal advice. © 2024 Zywave, Inc. All rights reserved.